Share this article
No items found.
No items found.

The definitive guide to expanding your business in LATAM.
A FREE 5-day email course that teaches you how to optimize your payment rates and simplify your operations.
Obtain the guide

Updated in 2026 with new platforms and commission comparisons.
If you want to sell online, choosing a payment gateway in Argentina is a key decision. It’s not just about “having a payment button”: it affects conversion rates, fees, settlement times, and operational processes (refunds, chargebacks, and statement reconciliation ).
If your transaction also includes international payments, add conversion, crediting times, and reconciliation between reports and the bank to the analysis.
In this guide, you will find: a quick comparison, a ranking with criteria (not just a "list"), what to look for in commissions, and what changes depending on your business: e-commerce, high-volume companies, or SaaS/subscriptions.
A payment gateway is the technology that enables online payments by connecting a merchant’s payment process with banks, card networks, and other payment methods. It typically handles the initiation of the payment, confirms the transaction status, and facilitates settlement and reporting for reconciliation.
In Argentina, it is useful to distinguish between three roles, because they are compared differently:
The table is a starting point. To make a decision, I requested details by payment method and credit period, and verified that the report allows you to reconcile (order, transaction, commissions, net, and settlements).
The comparison mixes acquirers, gateways, integrated platforms, and complementary solutions, because in practice many companies evaluate these options together when designing their payment stack in Argentina.
| Supplier | Type of solution | Main methods | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercado Pago | Integrated platform | Cards and transfers | Generalist e-commerce and businesses with high local volume |
| Payway | Purchaser | Cards | Companies with volume and commercial agreements |
| Mobbex | Gateway | Cards and other means (depending on the acquirer) | E-commerce seeking flexibility and control |
| PayU | Gateway / regional processor | Local cards and methods (depending on availability) | Companies with regional operations |
| dLocal | Platform for regional expansion | Local methods by country | Companies expanding in Latin America |
| Rebill | Integrated platform | Local cards and methods (depending on integration) | SaaS, online education, and digital businesses |
| Ship | Payment platform | Cards | Online stores seeking simple operation |
| GOquotas | Installment solution | Fees / cards | Businesses where financing is key |
| Getnet | Acquirer / ecosystem | Cards | Retail and omnichannel, high-volume companies |
| Fiserv / Clover | Collection ecosystem | Cards (depending on offer) | Commercial transaction with tools + payments |
Quick summary
Commissions, available payment methods, and crediting times may vary depending on the volume processed, type of business, acquirer used, and specific commercial conditions of each provider.
The ranges mentioned in this guide are public approximations and may change over time, so it is always advisable to confirm updated conditions directly with each platform.
Ranges and references revised in March 2026 based on publicly available information and conditions subject to commercial agreement.
The list includes ten relevant platforms that operate online payments in Argentina or allow local payment methods to be processed in the country.
This ranking prioritizes: actual online payment coverage in Argentina, ability to operate installments, clarity of costs by method, and ease of reconciling settlements. Conditions vary by industry, volume, and agreement, but the goal is to provide you with a meaningful comparison.
What it stands out for: It is usually the first option that businesses in Argentina consider due to brand recognition, quick implementation, and a familiar payment process for users.
Best for: E-commerce and businesses that prioritize rapid implementation and a familiar experience.
Advantages
Limitations
Payment methods: credit and debit cards, transfers, and other alternatives depending on configuration.
Integration: Integration via checkout (payment process) and APIs (application programming interfaces) depending on the product; status updates via notifications.
Costs/fee model: Public fee schedule. It is advisable to compare by payment method (credit/debit/transfer) and by credit term.
Type of solution: payment platform (gateway + wallet)
What it excels at: It is evaluated when the focus is on cards and operating with a more "banking" and negotiated scheme. In Argentina, it is widely used by companies with high volume or specific operational needs.
Best for: High-volume businesses that want to negotiate terms and order card operations.
Advantages
Limitations
Payment methods: Mainly credit and debit cards (depending on the contract).
Integration: Integrations and tools vary by product/contract. I requested examples of reports and fields.
Costs/fee model: By agreement. Compare commission by brand, credit term, and operating costs.
Type of solution: gateway/acquiring (business-oriented)
What it excels at: The choice for digital businesses seeking a payment solution with integration and operating options. Its unique selling point is its flexibility to adapt to different cash flows.
Best for: E-commerce and online businesses seeking flexibility in integration and operation.
Advantages
Limitations
Payment methods: Cards and other means depending on integration and configuration.
Integration: Integration via APIs (programming interfaces) and checkout components (payment process) according to the plan.
Costs/fee model: Variable depending on means and conditions. I requested details by means and accreditation.
Type of solution: gateway/payment platform
What it excels at: Regional provider that can serve you when you are looking to standardize integration across multiple countries while maintaining a similar workflow. In Argentina, convenience depends on the effective local offering.
Best for: Multi-country operations that prioritize regional consistency and centralized integration.
Advantages
Limitations
Payment methods: Cards and local methods depending on configuration and availability.
Integration: Integration via APIs (programming interfaces) and status events according to suite.
Costs/fee model: Variable (often based on volume/risk). Confirm conditions for Argentina.
Solution type: gateway/regional processor
What it excels at: It is widely used to collect payments in local currency in different countries and to handle international payment transactions. In Argentina, it can be part of a regional strategy for companies outside the country or with a multi-country structure.
Best for: International companies that require local collection and multi-country operations.
Advantages
Limitations
Payment methods: Cards and local methods depending on the market.
Integration: APIs (programming interfaces), events, and tools for multi-country operation.
Costs/fee model: for companies/by agreement.
Type of solution: local collection for international collection (for businesses)
What makes
stand out Rebill is geared toward digital businesses that need more than just payment processing. Its focus is on combining one-time and recurring payments with operational traceability: clear payment statements, transaction reconciliation, and net income visibility.
Best for
SaaS, memberships, online education, and digital products that need to combine one-time and recurring payments.
Advantages
Limitations
solution type Payment platform geared toward digital products and subscriptions.
payment methods Cards and local methods according to the configuration of the use case and the market where the company operates.
What it stands out for: Option to evaluate as a payment platform for digital businesses. The value lies in simplifying the operation, but it is essential to request details of payment methods, fees, and reports.
Best for: Online stores looking for an integrated solution that is simple to operate.
Advantages
Limitations
Payment methods: Cards and alternatives depending on configuration.
Integration: Checkout and integrations depending on the product.
Costs/fee model: Variable; confirm current conditions and terms.
Type of solution: payment platform
What it excels at: Its unique selling point is financing. This makes sense when installments are a strong conversion lever. It does not always compete as a "comprehensive gateway" across all media.
Best for: Businesses where fees determine conversion (average ticket, categories with financing).
Advantages
Limitations
Payment methods: Installments/cards depending on the product.
Integration: Integration according to channel and type of business.
Costs/fee model: Variable depending on plan. Request effective financing cost (impact on margin).
Type of solution: specialized installment solution (complementary)
What it excels at: It is chosen when the business needs a provider with omnichannel acquisition and operation components. In e-commerce, the evaluation is based on integration and reporting, not just brand.
Best for: Retail/omnichannel or businesses seeking an acquiring provider with tools.
Advantages
Limitations
Payment methods: Cards and other means as per contract.
Integration: Integrations vary by product. I requested examples of reports and events.
Costs/fee model: By agreement. Compare by brand, term, and operating costs.
Type of solution: acquiring + payment ecosystem (omnichannel)
What makes them stand out: They appear on the radar when businesses are looking for a more comprehensive payment ecosystem. For Argentina, the key is to validate local availability, partners, and actual reach (online and/or in person).
Best for: Businesses seeking a more comprehensive payment ecosystem (depending on local availability).
Advantages
Limitations
Payment methods: Cards and other means according to local availability.
Integration: Tools and integrations according to implementation.
Costs/pricing model: Variable depending on plan/agreement; consider total cost (service + equipment if applicable).
Type of solution: payment ecosystem (software + hardware) + processing
Here, it is important to be very specific: the commission depends on the payment method, the credit period, the item, and the agreement. When there is a public rate schedule, reference ranges can be used. Otherwise, the correct thing to do is to request a quote and compare it with the same basket of media.
Values may vary depending on the volume processed and commercial agreement.
To make a useful comparison, I requested details by method and payment term, and included in the comparison: returns, chargebacks, and how the net amount settled is reported. The "cheap" commission ceases to be so if the reconciliation ends up being manual work.
To collect payments online in Argentina, it is normal to start with cards and then add alternatives based on conversion and cost. Each method has a different impact on approval, fees, and operation.
In subscriptions, rejections matter more: a drop in approval translates into involuntary churn. You need smart retries, media updates, and a recovery flow (payment recovery) that does not depend on manual labor.
The important thing is to be able to track each cycle: attempt, approval/rejection, retry, recovery, return, adjustment, and settlement. This traceability reduces discussions with finance and speeds up period-end reconciliation.
It depends on the type of business. In e-commerce, conversion and fees tend to be important; in high-volume companies, agreements and cost control are important; in SaaS, retries, payment recovery, and cycle reconciliation are important.
It varies depending on the payment method, credit period, category, and commercial agreement. For comparison purposes, I requested a breakdown by method and term, and consider returns and chargebacks.
Prioritize installments, payment process experience, credit terms, and clear reports to reconcile settlements. Don't choose based on percentage alone.
I chose based on means, fees, integration, support, and report quality (identifiers, commissions, net, and settlements).
Collection networks such as Pago Fácil or Rapipago can serve as cash payment alternatives, but they are not payment gateways. If your audience needs them, add them as a complementary method to your main gateway to improve coverage.
To make the right choice in Argentina, compare: available methods (card, transfer, installments), credit terms, total cost (commissions + VAT + fees), support for returns/chargebacks, and the quality of reports for reconciling settlements.
If your operation involves acquirers, gateways, and integrated platforms, make sure you understand what role each provider plays so you don't duplicate costs or lose traceability.
Before comparing providers, confirm what role you need to fill: acquirer (cards and settlement), gateway (payment orchestration), or integrated platform (experience + operation). They are not chosen using the same criteria.
If your company sells digital products or works with subscription models, it may be useful to evaluate platforms designed specifically for that type of operation. In such cases, it is advisable to compare not only commissions, but also net income visibility, reconciliation, and tools for managing recurring payments.
If the money is credited in bulk, you need the report to allow you to reconstruct the net amount per transaction. Request minimum fields: order ID, transaction ID, status, commissions/fees, taxes if applicable, net amount, and settlement reference.
The actual commission depends on the payment method, the crediting period, and the commercial agreement. When a supplier publishes ranges, use them as a reference and always confirm the current conditions.
It is the technology that connects your payment process with banks, card networks, and other methods, and returns the status of each transaction to you for online collection and reconciliation.
The gateway orchestrates payment and status. The acquirer primarily processes cards and settles funds to the merchant, usually with a merchant ID.
It varies by method, accreditation period, category, and agreement. Compare the total cost and how commissions, taxes, and net amounts are reported for seamless reconciliation.
It depends on the model: e-commerce tends to prioritize quotas and conversion; companies with volume, agreements, and control; subscriptions, retries, and traceability by transaction and by cycle.
It depends on the country, but typically cards, transfers, installments, and local methods. The key is to combine conversion, costs, and operation with reports for reconciliation.
Payment gateways in Argentina are chosen based on conversion, costs, and operation. Make a shortlist, request a breakdown by method and term, and verify that reconciliation is possible without manual work (order, transaction, commissions, net, and settlements).
If you sell on credit, prioritize conditions and experience. If you are SaaS, the decision is usually determined by retries, payment recovery, and traceability per cycle.

.avif)